Legal Opinion

Huff v. Duncan

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1972PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, C.J.

This is a suit in which plaintiffs seek a decree declaring null and void a certain covenant which imposed building restrictions upon their land. The trial court granted the relief prayed for and defendants appeal.

Defendants purchased a parcel of land from Phil and Ida Steffes on May 25, 1962. On the same date, the parties executed a “Real Property Agreement” which recited that the Steffes, as first parties, “have sold and conveyed to GEO. R. DUNCAN, SR. and TERESE M. DUNCAN * * * a tract of land de scribed as follows [describing it], which conveyed land was a part of a tract conveyed to first…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Duester v. AlvinOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Brown v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Ready v. SchmithOregon Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bright v. Lake Linganore Ass'nCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  2. Ebbe v. Senior Estates Golf and Country ClubCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  3. Johnson v. State ex rel. Highway DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  4. Guy v. StateSuperior Court of Delaware · 1981
  5. Butler Family Ltd. Partnership v. Butler Bros., LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API