Legal Opinion

People v. Strickland

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 29, 1991No. 4-90-0257PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Steigmann

The peculiar procedural history of this case requires this court to analyze section 5—6—4 of the Unified Code of Corrections (Code) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1989, ch. 38, par. 1005—6—4), which deals with both revocations and modifications of probation, and to distinguish between the procedural requirements involved when the State seeks to have a defendant’s probation revoked as opposed to when the defendant’s probation is merely modified.

In August 1985, defendant, Debra Strickland, a/k/a Debra Rucks, pleaded guilty to theft of property (a diamond ring) having a value in excess of $300 (Ill. Rev.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. PriceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1960
  2. People v. RamosIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  3. People v. DingerIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  4. People v. FollowellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  5. People v. ButlerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Harris v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. People v. BirtAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  3. People v. McCrackenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  4. Harris v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. People v. McCrackenIllinois Supreme Court · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API