Legal Opinion

United States v. Samet

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 11, 2006No. Nos. 03-1420, 03-1433PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMARY ORDER

Mordechai Samet and Chaim Hollender appeal from their July 1, 2003 judgments of conviction in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (McMahon, J.). Appellants were charged with conducting and participating in the affairs of a racketeering enterprise in violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c), as well as several other violations of Title 18 of the United States Code including, inter alia, 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (mail fraud), 18 U.S.C. § 1343 (wire fraud), 18 U.S.C. § 1344 (bank fraud), 18 U.S.C §…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. United States v. Jerome CrosbyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. Wayne Gaskin, AKA "Atiba," and Al CastleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  5. United States v. JacobsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Byron Keith Allen, United States of America v. Ernest Robert ReinhardtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
  2. United States v. KowalDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2007
  3. United States v. Elekwachi KaluCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
  4. Johnson v. MartinezDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
  5. United States v. HawesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API