Legal Opinion

Baines v. City of Birmingham

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided June 30, 1970No. 6 Div. 41PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRICE, Presiding Judge.

This appellant was convicted for a violation of Section 16-2 of the General City *269Code of the City of Birmingham, Alabama. A fine of $50.00 was imposed as punishment.

The complaint alleges that Jim Baines on to-wit: “November 23, 1968, and within the City of Birmingham at, to-wit: Woodrow Wilson Park, did disturb the peace of others by profane language, to-wit: did use the expression ‘God Damn,’ contrary to and in violation of Section 16-2 of the General City Code of Birmingham, of 1964.”

Section 16-2 of the General City Code of Birmingham reads:

“Any person who disturbs…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. George Albert Williams v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  4. Duncan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
  5. Dominic Peter Gagliardo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Anniskette v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Baines v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  3. Baines v. City of BirminghamCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API