M. J. Spaulding Implement Co. v. Goforth
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from County Court, Craig County; S. F. Parks, Judge. Action by A. P. Goforth against the M. J. Spaulding Implement Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
ROBBERTS, C.
On the 12th day of October, 1912, A. P. Goforth commenced this action before a justice of the peace in Craig county against M. J. Spaulding Implement Company to recover judgment for $160 as purchase price for a hay press. The bill of particulars was entitled “A. P. Goforth v. J. M. Spaulding Imp. Co.” The cost bond filed by plaintiff gave “M. J. Spaulding Imp. Co.” as defendant. The body of the summons showed “J. M. S.,” but the return of' the sheriff shows the summons served on “M. J. S.” The record shows that the initials of Spaulding were used interchangeably in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- St. Louis, Kansas & Southwestern Railway Co. v. MorseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
- McClelland Bros. v. AllisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
- St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. HurstSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
3Cited by3 opinions
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
- Graokla Gas Co. v. ChathamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Magerus v. DossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940