Legal Opinion

Kalilu v. Mukasey

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 13, 2008No. 06-75425PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION

ORDER

The majority opinion filed February 14, 2008, slip op. 1369, and appearing at 516 F.3d 777 (9th Cir.2008), is hereby amended as follows:

1.slip op. at 1374, line 3: Replace “and” with “or.”

2. slip op. at 1374, lines 3-5: Replace “If an alien is removed, he is no longer eligible for adjustment of status. See 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(9)(A)(ii).” with “If an alien is removed, his adjustment application is deemed abandoned. 8 C.F.R. § 245.2(a)(4)(ii)(A). The alien cannot reapply for adjustment of status until he has reentered the United States, which he is barred from doing…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Lucio Ricardo Alvarez-Santos, AKA Luciano Ricardo Alvarez AKA Lucio Ricardo Alvarez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Lara-Torres v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. Juan Cesar Vargas v. U.S. Department of Immigration and NaturalizationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. VELARDEBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2002
  5. Duarte De Guinac v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. MacArio Bonilla v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. YAURIBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2009
  3. Tarlock Singh v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. Hazmik Kulakchyan v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  5. Clifton v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API