Legal Opinion · Concurrence

New Richmond News v. City of New Richmond

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 2015No. 2014AP001938Published

1ConcurrenceShirley S. Abrahamson, J.

¶ 5. {concurring). I concur in the per curiam opinion vacating the order granting the petition to bypass and remanding this case to the court of appeals.

¶ 6. I write separately to memorialize the approach being taken in the instant case following a new justice's (here Justice Rebecca G. Bradley's) appoint*613ment to the court, and to compare the practice at this time with past practice in this court and in the United States Supreme Court.

¶ 7. The per curiam looks regular in its form.1 The instant case differs, however, from past cases vacating the order granting the petition to bypass and…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Garcetti v. CeballosSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Indian Towing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Hudson v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Bartkus v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API