Legal Opinion

Perry National Bank v. Engnell

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 24, 1924PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVermilion, J.

The plaintiff bank, the appellant, sued to recover the amount due on a promissory note for $3,500, given by the defendant to the Perry Stpck .Remedy Manufacturing Company, alleging its purchase of the note from the payee, before maturity and for value.. The defendant, in answer, alleged ■ that- the note was without consideration, and was procured by fraud, in that he never intended to execute a note, and his signature thereto was procured by -fraud of one C. B. Boyer, acting for the payee, in falsely representing said note to be merely an agreement • for defendant’s son to act as agent in…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Curtis v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
  2. Woodbury Co. v. Dougherty & Bryant Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  3. Thomas v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  4. Chandler v. KennedySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Navajo County Bank v. DolsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
  2. Holmes v. GrossSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
  3. Jordan v. SchantzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
  4. Bletzer v. WilsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
  5. Rupp v. KohnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API