Legal Opinion

Brogden v. Baugh

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 17, 1936No. 26784PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorn, J.

The parties to this appeal will hereafter be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.

This appeal is from a judgment of the district court of Creek county, sustaining a demurrer to plaintiff’s evidence and dismissing plaintiff’s case, on the theory that plaintiff’s evidence showed that his cause of action was barred by the statute of limitations.

On the 3rd day of May, 1935, the plaintiff filed this action in the lower court to recover from the defendant the sum of $385 for medical services rendered by him to Jennie A. Baugh during her lifetime, covering a period of time from December…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Constantinides v. WalshMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  2. Muse v. London Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  3. Schneider v. Estate of BreierWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Kelley v. WilsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  5. Charron v. DayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Estate of Bell-Levine v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
  2. In Re Estate of MacFarlineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  3. Hough v. HoughSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. Griffen v. ColeArizona Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Truax v. EllettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API