Legal Opinion
Tarr v. Narconon Fresh Start
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided December 8, 2014No. Case No. 2:14-cv-0283-GMN-NJKPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1140ORDER
GLORIA M. NAVARRO, Chief Judge.
Presently before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss, (ECF No. 20), filed by Defendant Narconon Fresh Start (“Narconon”). Plaintiffs Cathy Tarr and Michael Tarr filed a Response in opposition, (ECF No. 27), and Narconon filed a Reply, (ECF No. 28). For the reasons set forth below, the Court will deny the motion.
I. BACKGROUND
This case centers upon allegations that a drug rehabilitation program operated by Narconon was actually a surreptitious scheme to indoctrinate unsuspecting individuals into the Church of Scientology. (First Am. Compl., ECF No. 15).…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Jerry L. Branch, Valenna Branch, Colby Branch v. Dale L. Tunnell, Individually and as Special Agent of Bureau of Land Management, State of MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Matthys v. Narconon Fresh StartDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2015
- Barranco v. WoodsDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2019
- Deppoleto v. Takeover Industries IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2023
- H&H Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Chattem Chemicals, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2020
- Hunter v. U.S. Bank National AssociationDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.