Legal Opinion
Hannigan v. United States
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Decided March 10, 2015No. 7:09-CR-133-D, No. 7:14-CV-122-DPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JAMES C. DEVER III, Chief United States District Judge
On June 5, 2014, Christopher Matthew Hannigan (“Hannigan”) moved pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct .his 336-month sentence. See [D.E. 33]. On July 22, 2014, the United States (“government”) • moved to dismiss Hannigan’s section 2255 motion' as untimely and filed a supporting memorandum. See [D.E. 37, 38]. On August 29, 2014, Hannigan responded in opposition. See [D.E. 43]. As explained below, the court grants the government’s motion to dismiss and dismisses Hannigan’s section 2255 motion as untimely.
I
On…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Amos v. USA 2255District Court, D. Maryland · 2020
- Branch v. USA - 2255District Court, D. Maryland · 2022
- Fitch v. MayDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2024
- Ivory v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2023
- Makes Him First v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.