Legal Opinion

Stoe v. Garland

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 14, 2021No. Civil Action No. 2016-1618Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEBRA STOE, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 16-1618 (JDB) MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Debra Stoe, a scientist in the Department of Justice’s (“DOJ”) Office of Science and Technology (“OST”), was denied a promotion in 2014 to serve as OST’s Division Director. Mark Greene, a younger man with less experience at OST, received the job instead. The selecting official was plaintiff’s then-supervisor Chris Tillery. See Joint Pretrial Statement [ECF No. 41] at 5. Thereafter, Stoe brought…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. McKennon v. Nashville Banner Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Ronald J. Fischbach v. District of Columbia Department of Corrections and Hallem H. Williams, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  5. Sprint/United Management Co. v. MendelsohnSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API