Legal Opinion

American Anodco, Inc. And American Bumper & Manufacturing Company, Inc., Cross-Appellants v. Reynolds Metals Company, Cross-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 12, 1984No. 82-1945, 83-1013, 83-1101 and 83-1102Published

1Opinion of the Court

743 F.2d 417

AMERICAN ANODCO, INC. and American Bumper & Manufacturing

Company, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees, Cross-Appellants,

v.

REYNOLDS METALS COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant, Cross-Appellee.

Nos. 82-1945, 83-1013, 83-1101 and 83-1102.

United States Court of Appeals,

Sixth Circuit.

Argued April 30, 1984.

Decided Sept. 12, 1984.

Thomas F. Koernke (argued), Tolley, Fisher & Verwys, Todd Dickinson, Grand Rapids, Mich., for defendant-appellant, cross-appellee.

Thomas J. Heiden (argued), Miller, Canfield, Paddock & Stone, Grand Rapids, Mich., for plaintiffs-appellees, cross-appellants in all cases.

Charles L.…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Allison v. ChandlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  2. College Point Boat Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. R. E. B., Inc. v. Ralston Purina Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
  4. Goodwin, Inc v. Orson E Coe Pontiac, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  5. American Anodco, Inc. And American Bumper & Manufacturing Company, Inc., Cross-Appellants v. Reynolds Metals Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API