Legal Opinion

State v. Bennett

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 20, 1967No. 90PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant was called upon in the superior court to plead to the bill of indictment, not to the warrant under which he was arrested. The caption of an indictment, whether on the front or the back thereof, is not a part of it and the designation therein of the offense sought to be charged can neither enlarge nor diminish the offense charged in the body of the instrument. State v. Davis, 225 N.C. 117, 33 S.E. 2d 623; State v. Brickell, 8 N.C. 354. Furthermore, the words, “Third Offense,” even if included in the body of the indictment are not sufficient to charge the offense of felonious…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  2. State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. State v. Brickell.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1821

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. State v. BillingerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  3. State v. ReddickCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  4. State v. WilkesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
  5. State v. WimbishCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API