Palazzolo v. Pan-Atlantic S. S. Corp. Pan-Atlantic S. S. Corp. v. Ryan Stevedoring Co., Inc
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Circuit Judge.
Defendant-appellant, Pan-Atlantic, has argued that, since Ryan Stevedoring Company created the hazardous condition by improperly stowingr the cargo in Georgetown, South Carolina, Pan-Atlantic should not be held, liable to plaintiff. We cannot agree. Not only did defendant owe the duty to-provide a seaworthy ship on which plaintiff-stevedore might work, Seas. Shipping Company v. Sieracki, 328 U.S. 85, 66 S.Ct. 872, 90 L.Ed. 1099, but it owed him, as a business visitor or invitee, the duty to provide a reasonably safe place to do his work. Fodera v. Booth American Shipping…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- McFall v. Compagnie Maritime Belge (Lloyd Royal) S. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Rich v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Gila Valley, Globe & Northern Railway Co. v. LyonSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Grasso v. LorentzenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Gutierrez v. Waterman Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Italia Societa Rer Azioni Di Navigazione v. Oregon Stevedoring Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Sergio Degioia v. United States Lines Company, and Third-Party v. American Stevedores, Inc., and Imparato Stevedoring Corp., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Berti v. Compagnie De Navigation Cyprien Fabre (American Stevedores, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Appellee)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.