Legal Opinion
Greenfield v. Mandalay Shores Community Assn.
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 27, 2018No. B281089Published
1Opinion of the Court
Filed 3/27/18 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX ROBERT S. GREENFIELD et 2d Civil No. B281089 al., (Super. Ct. No. 56-2016-00485246-CU- MC-VTA) Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Ventura County) v. MANDALAY SHORES COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, Defendant and Respondent. One of the basic goals of the California Coastal Act of 1976 is to “maximize public access” to the beach. An appellate court is to liberally construe the Coastal Act to achieve this goal. Respondent Mandalay Shores Community Association has not erected a physical…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pacific Palisades Bowl Mobile Estates, LLC v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- MHC Operating Limited Partnership v. City of San JoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Hines v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- California Coastal Commission v. Quanta Investment Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1980
- LT-WR, L.L.C. v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.