Legal Opinion

Bohl v. City of Schenectady

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1927PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

The plaintiffs have brought this action against the defendant city, its mayor and commissioner of public safety, to restrain them from interfering with plaintiffs’ operation of motor buses within the city of Schenectady and to perpetually enjoin them from enforcing the provisions of an ordinance adopted by the city’s common council on January 4, 1927, which, in effect, repealed a former ordinance of the same body passed on May 21, 1923. The plaintiffs secured from a justice of this court a temporary injunction and this application is upon the return of the order to show cause why it should…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. . O'BrienNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. California v. Central Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. City of Owensboro v. Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Lord v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  5. Trustees of Freeholders & Commonalty v. JessupNew York Court of Appeals · 1900

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Greenberg v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Washington-St. Tammany Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. St. Tammany Parish Police JuryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API