Legal Opinion
O'Boyle v. City of New York
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 3, 1930PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WO OLSEY, District Judge.
My decision in this case is that the libelant shall recover its damage from the city of New York with •costs, and that the libel as against the tug P. R. R. No. 35 shall be dismissed without costs.
At the conclusion of the trial on December 18, 1929, I said that, whilst I was not prepared to decide the liability as between the three parties at that time, I was prepared to state that I believed the story of the libelant’s barge captain that he warned the tug’s crew against putting him on the south side of pier 48; • that his warning was pointed only to the depth of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kirby v. TallmadgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Smith v. BurnettSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Runkle v. BurnhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Doherty v. Pennsylvania R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
- Look v. Portsmouth, K. & Y. St. Ry.District Court, D. Maine · 1905
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Norfolk Tidewater Terminals, Inc. v. Wood Towing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
- The White CityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Crain Bros. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1957