Legal Opinion
Haywood v. Commissioner of Social Security
District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Decided August 1, 2023No. 3:22-cv-00449Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:22-cv-449-MOC DAVID EUGENE HAYWOOD, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Vs. ) ORDER ) KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ) Acting Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) THIS MATTER is before the Court on the parties’ opposing Motions for Summary Judgment. (Doc. Nos. 8, 12). Plaintiff, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeks judicial review of Defendant’s final decision that Plaintiff was not disabled within the meaning of Title II of the Social Security Act (“Act”). For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Reddick v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Donna J. Clifford v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Ronda S. CRAIG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.