Legal Opinion

Baranski v. Fifteen Unknown Agents of ATF

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided March 22, 2002No. CIV.A.3:01CV-398-HPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HEYBURN, Chief Judge.

In April, 2001, federal agents searched a warehouse in Louisville, Kentucky, and seized a large number of firearms. Plaintiffs, two entities affected by the government’s actions, correspondingly filed suit against Defendants, twenty one individual agents and the United States, alleging eight causes of action. Defendants have filed a variety of motions, both dispositive and otherwise, all of which Plaintiffs oppose. These motions raise interesting questions about the manner in which one may oppose or challenge government seizure of property. The Court…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. KordelSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Rmi Titanium Company v. Westinghouse Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Bennis v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Search of S & S: Custom Cycle Shop, 642 Hillrose Ave.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2003
  2. Shaw v. U.S. Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API