United States v. Lex
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KARLTON, Senior District Judge.
Federal regulations define the right to use federal land. They prohibit, inter alia, the:(b) Taking possession of, occupying, or otherwise using National Forest System lands for residential purposes without a special-use authorization, or as otherwise authorized by Federal law or regulation
36 C.F.R. 261.10(b)
and provide for criminal sanctions for violation. 1
Appellants were prosecuted before a United States Magistrate Judge for a violation of the above regulation. They brought a Rule 29 motion at the close of the government’s case, contending that they were…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- City of Chicago v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Giaccio v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Pauley v. BethEnergy Mines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Public Lands for the People, Inc. v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
- Karuk Tribe of California v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2005
- United States v. LowryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. FayDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2008
- United States v. McClureDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.