Legal Opinion

United States v. Lex

District Court, E.D. California

Decided May 14, 2003No. CR S-01-559 LKKPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

KARLTON, Senior District Judge.

Federal regulations define the right to use federal land. They prohibit, inter alia, the:(b) Taking possession of, occupying, or otherwise using National Forest System lands for residential purposes without a special-use authorization, or as otherwise authorized by Federal law or regulation

36 C.F.R. 261.10(b)

and provide for criminal sanctions for violation. 1

Appellants were prosecuted before a United States Magistrate Judge for a violation of the above regulation. They brought a Rule 29 motion at the close of the government’s case, contending that they were…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  3. City of Chicago v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Giaccio v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Pauley v. BethEnergy Mines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Public Lands for the People, Inc. v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
  2. Karuk Tribe of California v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2005
  3. United States v. LowryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. FayDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2008
  5. United States v. McClureDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API