Legal Opinion

Varnell v. Varnell

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 27, 1923No. 3733PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.

1. The allegation m the answer of the defendant setting up a parol purchase of the land, fully executed, comes within the exceptions to the statute of frauds. Civil Code (1910), § 3223, par. 1.

2. The defendant objecting to the partition claims title to the entire interest in the land, by virtue of a purchase from his mother, Lavina Varnell, and alleges that the latter was empowered to make a salfe under the will of his father, Mitchell P. Varnell, as contained in the following item, to wit: “Item second. I will and bequeath to my beloved wife, Lavina, all my real and personal property both…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Woodbery v. Atlas Realty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  2. Mayo v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  3. Cannon v. LaingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  4. Nort v. Healy Real Estate & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  5. Stark v. ChambersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Holland v. ShackelfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
  2. Duggar v. QuartermanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  3. Osborn v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
  4. Barron v. AndersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  5. Hale v. LiphamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API