Legal Opinion
United States v. William A. Dodds
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 7, 1991No. 90-3348PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHRISTENSEN, Senior District Judge.
Defendant-appellant William A. Dodds, having been charged by indictment with the robbery of a federally-insured bank in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a), (d), moved for the suppression of evidence claimed to have been obtained contrary to his Fourth Amendment rights. His motion to suppress was denied by the district court. With its approval and the consent of the government, defendant entered a conditional plea of guilty pursuant to Fed.R.Cr.P. 11(a)(2), thus reserving for appeal following his plea and prison sentence the two issues now before us: (1)…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Minnesota v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. Jorge Enrique ArangoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. Manuel Dozal, United States of America v. Rudy GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Harold McRaeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
- United States v. Oscar BetancurCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.