Legal Opinion

Kursheedt Mfg. Co. v. Naday

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 24, 1901No. Nos. 116, 117PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeals from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. On motion to tax cost of printing brief.

1Per curiam

The rule in this court for many years has been not to allow the sum paid for printing briefs or arguments as part of the taxable costs or disbursements, except when specially provided for by rule. In this respect the practice conforms, to that of the supreme court.

2Cited by4 opinions

Joseph Scaduto v. Anthony J. Orlando, D/B/A A. J. Orlando Contracting Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
Bond v. United RailroadsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
Bailey v. Mississippi Home Telephone Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1918
United States v. Thlinket Packing Co.District Court, D. Alaska · 1918