Bailey v. Mississippi Home Telephone Co.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Action by John R. Bailey against the Mississippi Home Telephone Company. On rules to set aside writs of fi. fa. and attachment execution.
1Opinion of the Court
WITMER, District Judge.
The plaintiff, John R. Bailey, sued the defendant, the Mississippi Home Telephone Company, in an action of assumpsit. The case was tried in the District Court, and plaintiff was nonsuited. Upon refusal to take off the nonsuit, he appealed, and the Circuit Court of Appeals (252 Fed. 581, - C. C. A. ) reversed the judgment, ‘with costs, and ordered a new trial.
On the 12th day of August, 1918, plaintiff filed the following bill of costs in the District Court:
J. P. Helfenstein, a witness duly subpoenaed in behalf of plain' tiff and present at the trial 140 miles circular @…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lee Injector Mfg. Co. v. Penberthy Injector Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1901
- Ex Parte HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Berthold v. BurtonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1909
- Jennings v. BurtonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1910
- Kursheedt Mfg. Co. v. NadayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1901
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- American Trust Co. v. Speers Sand & Clay Works, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1932
- Broffe v. HortonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949