Legal Opinion

Condiotti v. Board of County Commissioners

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided June 24, 1999No. 98CA0740PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge ROTHENBERG.

Plaintiff, Mark Condiotti, appeals the trial court’s dismissal of his challenge for lack of standing to a land use resolution adopted by defendant, Board of County Commissioners of La Plata County (Board). Because we conclude that Condiotti has standing under C.R.C.P. 57, we reverse.

Condiotti owns property in La Plata County. The county regulates land use through the La Plata Land Use System (land use system), which employs a permit system rather than zoning districts.

Under the land use system, landowners are required to obtain permits before commencing any action…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Wimberly v. EttenbergSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  2. Board of County Commissioners v. Bowen/Edwards Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  3. Dunlap v. Colorado Springs Cablevision, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  4. Baum v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  5. Tri-State Generation & Transmission Co. v. City of ThorntonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Abromeit v. Denver Career Service BoardColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. JJR 1, LLC v. Mt. Crested ButteColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Quaker Court Ltd. Liability Co. v. Board of County CommissionersColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Native American Rights Fund, Inc. v. City of BoulderColorado Court of Appeals · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API