Legal Opinion
Native American Rights Fund, Inc. v. City of Boulder
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided March 11, 2004No. 02CA2243PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge LOEB.
Native American Rights Fund, Inc. (NARF) appeals the district court’s order denying its claims against defendants, the City of Boulder, the City Council, and various city officials and council members (collectively City). NARF sought a declaratory judgment or a finding under C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4) that certain city ordinances that created and then purported to amend the Grandview Terrace Historic District (District) are invalid or that the properties owned by NARF within the District are exempt. We reverse.
In October 1999, the Colorado Arts and Crafts Society (CACS) applied…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Town of Telluride v. Lot Thirty-Four Venture, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Margolis v. District Court in & for the County of ArapahoeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- Robertson v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Cottrell v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- Hartnett v. AustinSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hellas Construction, Inc. v. Rio Blanco CountyColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
- City of Boulder v. Public Service Company of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
- Quaker Court Ltd. Liability Co. v. Board of County CommissionersColorado Court of Appeals · 2004