Legal Opinion

Fanning v. Russell

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 26, 1886PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In error to the Circuit Court of Sangamon County; the Hon. James A. Creighton, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtPleasants, P. J.

A former decree in this case was reversed by this court upon appeal taken by these defendants in error, and the cause -remanded. 10 Ill. App. 304. The scope and result of other litigation over the same transactions may be seen in Russell v. Fanning, 2 Ill. App. 632, and 94 Ill. 386,

Inasmuch as no legal question of importance is presented by this record,-it is unnecessary to repeat the statement of its history and status up to the time of the last reversal, which fully appears in the opinions so reported.

When it was redocketed upon being last remanded the defendants in error obtained leave to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fanning v. RussellIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Russell v. EplerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1882
  3. Russell v. FanningAppellate Court of Illinois · 1878

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rogerson v. FanningIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Rogerson v. George W.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API