Legal Opinion

Russell v. Fanning

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 15, 1878PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Morgan county; the Hon. Cyrus Epler, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtLacey, J.

The bill in this case sets out that on the 15th Sept., 1869, Sampson, Wm. and Samuel A. Fanning executed to Andrew Russell, agent of complainants, their promissory note for .$2,097, due in one year from date, and on the 8th day of March, 1871, their other note to same payee, due in 18 months from date, each hearing interest at the rate of ten per cent, per annum, for $9,000. That at the time of the execution of said notes, Samuel Fanning was the owner in fee of the following described real estate, to wit: (1.) FT. W. ¿ Sec. 9, No. Í3, N. R. 10 west, 160 acres; (2.) N.E. ¿sec. 9, same town…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Moritz v. HoffmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Emerson v. BemisIllinois Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fanning v. RussellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1886
  2. Rogerson v. FanningIllinois Supreme Court · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API