Legal Opinion

United States v. Ohio Oil Co.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 10, 1947No. 3412PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAH, Circuit Judge.

Acting under asserted authority of an administrative regulation, as embodied in departmental oil and gas leases, the Secretary of the Interior determined the minimum value for which he would accept payment for royalty oil produced from such leases in the Lance Creek Oil Field in Wyoming, and threatened to institute appropriate proceedings to cancel the leases unless the lessees paid the minimum price fixed and determined by him. The Ohio Oil Company, as one of the lessees, finally paid the difference between 770 per barrel, the price for which it sold the royalty oil to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Utah Power & Light Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. United States v. City & County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Schillinger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. United States v. Emery, Bird, Thayer Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. United States v. HvoslefSupreme Court of the United States · 1915

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ralston Steel Corporation, Assignee of Morgan Manufacturing Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  2. Broderick Wood Products Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
  3. Oldland v. GrayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
  4. Continental Oil Co. v. United States. United States v. Continental Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  5. United States v. Irene Essley, Irene Essley, Cross-Appellant v. United States of America, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API