Legal Opinion

Doe v. Noe

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 26, 1997No. 1—96—3791, 1—96—3855 consPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE GREIMAN

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiffs Jane Doe (Jane) and her husband John Doe (John) appeal the dismissal of 14 counts in their 18-count second amended complaint, asserting several causes of action premised on the underlying allegation that Jane had been exposed to the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) during two gynecological surgeries by John Noe No. 2 (hereinafter Surgeon), i.e., the doctor who performed the surgeries and was HIV positive at the time of the surgeries and subsequently died of acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS).

The crux of…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Jerry W. Canterbury v. William Thornton Spence and the Washington Hospital Center, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  2. Kirk v. Michael Reese Hospital & Medical CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  3. McGrath v. FaheyIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Adcock v. Brakegate, Ltd.Illinois Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Bucheleres v. Chicago Park DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1996

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cain v. HoworthSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  2. Cochran v. Wyeth, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. McDonald v. LipovAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
  4. Fiala v. Bickford Senior Living Group, LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2016
  5. McClure v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API