Legal Opinion
John H. Meier v. William Keller and Robert Bork, John H. Meier v. William Keller, John H. Meier v. Devoe Heaton
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 1, 1975No. 74-1182, 74-1673, 74-1910PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge:
These appeals arise from separate actions which Meier filed in two different district courts to prevent Suckling, an attorney who had done legal work in connection with Meier’s sales of certain, mining claims, from giving grand jury testimony and cooperating with a federal investigation of possible tax evasion and conspiracy charges against Meier. Both complaints, the first filed in the Central District of California, the second in the District of Nevada, alleged that Suckling had violated the attorney-client privilege by providing information and certain…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Douglas v. City of JeannetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- DiBella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Molinaro v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- In Re FriedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- United States v. James Leroy MartinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Steven Eugene Smith, Randy Ray SmithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Glen HermanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Duskin Claude BeckerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. John Richard HumphriesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.