Legal Opinion

State v. Normand

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 5, 1971No. 51049PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*271On Application for Writs

BARHAM, Justice,

is of the opinion that the writ should not be considered. Relator has failed to comply with the written rules of this court in his application by simply filing a petition for relief: No part of the trial record, not even the minutes, is made a part of the application. Additionally, relator has failed to comply with a rule which was created jurisprudentially. In State v. Foret, 245 La. 70, 156 So.2d 606, this court, analogizing from State v. Richardson, 220 La. 338, 56 So.2d 568, that perfected bills of exception are required in applications for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
  2. State v. ForetSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1963
  3. State v. ForetSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1963

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. HaikSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
  2. State v. ManuelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API