Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Haik

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 21, 1971No. 51126Published

1DissentBarham, Justice

Relator has presented to this court an application for certiorari after conviction and sentence m a criminal prosecution from which he has no right of appeal. He did not include any bills of exception in the application. This court has repeatedly denied writs in criminal cases for years on the ground that perfected bills of exception are required in such applications. That “rule”, however, has never been incorporated in the official rules of court. It is to be *545found only in writ denials, which usually are published without headnotes or “keys” and which we have said do not state law binding…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. ForetSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1963
  2. State v. ForetSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1963
  3. State v. LanouxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
  4. State v. NormandSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
  5. State v. DeBateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API