Gillette v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PIERCE, J. *
Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board on reconsideration dated August 18, 1970. In that order the board found and held that applicant Robert R. Gillette “did not sustain injury arising out of and occurring in the course of his employment.” Applicant petitioned for review of that order upon the ground that the board in its original order granting reconsideration (dated March 20, 1970) lacked power to make such an order. We issued a writ of review and will annul the order. We concur with petitioner that the board had lacked power to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
- Place v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Redner v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- State Employee's Retirement System v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Michon v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Oiye v. FoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Muznik v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Zozaya v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Solomon v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.