Otto v. Griffin
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered September 23, 1908, upon granting defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, dismissing an action for goods sold and delivered.
1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.
Action by J. N. Otto against E. I. Griffin, Laura W. Griffin, his wife, and F. M. Blake, for goods sold and delivered. The plaintiff alleged that the defendants E. I. *507Griffin and F. M. Blake were copartners conducting a hotel in Snohomish county; that plaintiff and his assignor, one William Kingdon, had sold the partnership goods and supplies for use in their business, and that they had not paid for the same. The complaint stated two causes of action, one for the goods sold by the plaintiff, and the other for the goods sold by his assignor, William Kingdon. The defendant Blake defaulted. The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jagger Iron Co. v. . WalkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Happy v. . MosherNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Lane & Bodley Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
- Menzel v. PrimmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Smith v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Keeler v. ParksWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- White v. MillionWashington Supreme Court · 1933