Legal Opinion

Farrell v. AUTO. CLUB OF MICHIGAN

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 6, 1986No. Docket 80094PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDanhof, C.J.

Claimant, Bruce Farrell, appeals as of right from a circuit court order reversing a decision of the Michigan Employment Security Commission Board of Review. The board had reversed a decision of its hearing officer who had determined that claimant was excluded from benefits under § 43(h) of the Michigan Employment Security Act, MCL 421.1 et seq.; MSA 17.501 et seq. The hearing officer upheld his decision at a redetermination hearing.

Claimant was employed by the Automobile Club of Michigan as an insurance salesman. He sold homeowners, life and automobile insurance. He was compensated on a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Life & Accident Insurance v. Board of Review of the Department of LaborIllinois Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Smith v. StarkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Equitable Trust Co. v. Milton Realty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  4. American National Insurance v. KeitelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
  5. Rogers v. DuffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nolan v. Department of Licensing & RegulationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Dow Chemical Co. v. CurtisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Farrell v. Auto Club of MichiganMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Northville Township v. CoyneMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Village of Peck v. HoistMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API