Legal Opinion
Aronson v. Toy Devices, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 16, 1924No. 3040, 3041PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from decrees of the District Court dismissing the bills filed for the infringement of United States patents No. 1,140,649 and No. 1,140,650 for want of invention. There were two bills filed, one based on each patent, but they were heard together in the District Court, were argued together here, and will he disposed of in one opinion.
The patents relate to improvements in mechanism for controlling the character of sound emitted in talking toy devices. The patents, therefore, are not basic, but are simply for improvements in mechanism adapted to make the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Franklin Brass Foundry Co. v. Shapiro & Aronson, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1921
- Dececo Co. v. George E. Gilchrist Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1903
- Brown v. Huntington Piano Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1904
- Hobbs Mfg. Co. v. GoodingCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1901
3Cited by9 opinions
- O'LEARY v. Liggett Drug Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
- Bassick Mfg. Co. v. Adams Grease Gun CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Northern Engineering and Plastics Corp. v. Roger Eddy D/B/A Marshall Manufacturing Co., and Pacific Cap CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Baldwin-Southwark Corp. v. Tinius Olsen Testing Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1937
- Kilgore Mfg. Co. v. Triumph Explosives, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.