Legal Opinion

State v. Grimm

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1992No. S-91-147PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Donald R. Grimm appeals the order of the district court denying his plea in bar. We affirm.

The issue presented here is one of law, and “appellate courts are required to review questions of law de novo on the record.” Workman v. Stehlik, 238 Neb. 666, 668-69, 471 N.W.2d 760, 762 (1991).

On October 7, 1990, Grimm was arrested in Omaha and charged with the subject charge, operating a motor vehicle while his license was suspended, in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.07 (Cum. Supp. 1990), a Class IV felony. On the same day, Grimm was also charged under § 39-669.07 with third-offense driving…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. State v. WoodforkNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. HarringtonNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Workman v. StehlikNebraska Supreme Court · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. SinselNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. PaulsenNebraska Supreme Court · 2019
  3. State v. PaulsenNebraska Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API