Braxton Minerals III, LLC v. Antero Resources Corporation
District Court, N.D. West Virginia
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA BRAXTON MINERALS III, LLC et al., Plaintiffs, v. CIVIL NO. 1:21-CV-119 (KLEEH) ANTERO RESOURCES CORPORATION, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO STRIKE AND/OR DISMISS, STAYING DISCOVERY ORDERS, AND DENYING OBJECTIONS AS MOOT Pending before the Court is a motion to strike the class allegations and/or dismiss the fourth amended complaint. For the reasons discussed herein, the motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. I. BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Republican Party of North Carolina v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- Anderson v. Sara Lee Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.