Anderson v. Rowland
Court of Appeals of Texas
Appeal from McLennan. Tried below before Hon. Marshall Surratt.
1Opinion of the Court
FISHER, Chief Justice.
On the 17th day of December, 1896, J. E. Smith sold and conveyed to H. Iv. Rowland a certain lot in the city of Waco, and in the deed conveying said lot, Smith uses the following language, to wit: “As a further consideration for this purchase and sale, I, the said J. E. Smith, obligate myself not to run or permit to be run any saloon or place for the sale of malt or intoxicating liquors in any building now owned by me in the same block in which the above described property is situated, whether I continue to own said property or sell or convey the same to other parties,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Davenport v. New England Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1850
- Hills v. MillerNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
- Barrow v. RichardNew York Court of Chancery · 1840
- Texas Standard Oil Co. v. AdoueTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- Jeffery v. GrahamTexas Supreme Court · 1884
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Curlee v. WalkerTexas Supreme Court · 1922
- Ray v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1952
- Plaster v. StutzmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Bettinger v. North Fort Worth Ice Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Chandler v. DarwinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.