Legal Opinion

Frank v. McClanahan

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 5, 2008No. Nos. 36206-6-II; 36213-9-II; 36603-7-IIPublished

1Opinion of the CourtBridgewater, J.

¶1 David Frank appeals from the trial court’s order declaring that article VII, section 2 of Kenneth *313and Catherine Franks’1 wills, bequesting real property known as Cranberry Lake, to the Frank Family Foundation (Foundation), did not adeem. The court’s order declared that even if the estates acquired an interest in Cranberry Lake, the personal representative would have to distribute the property to the Foundation under article VII, section 2 of the wills. Based on that order, the trial court granted the Foundation’s motion for summary judgment, reasoning that because the Franks’ bequest under…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hisle v. Todd Pacific Shipyards Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Hisle v. Todd Pacific Shipyards Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Kenaday v. SinnottSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  4. Bank of America, NA v. Prestance Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Bank of America v. Prestance Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API