Legal Opinion

Warden v. Nahas

California Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1931No. Docket No. L.A. 11944PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT. —

The plaintiff commenced this action to quiet title to lot 62, Bauchet tract, in the county of Los Angeles, her claim of title being based on a deed from the county tax collector issued after the sale of the property for nonpayment of taxes. The complaint was in the usual form in actions to quiet title. The answer was equally brief, containing specific denials of the averments of the complaint. Upon the trial the plaintiff offered such evidence as she had in support of her title, and also offered evidence to the effect that she had made certain payments of taxes on the property…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bloom v. BloomCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Newcomb v. City of Newport BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Booth v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Brown v. ButtsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Faust v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API