Legal Opinion

Booth v. Taylor

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 17, 1933No. Docket No. 8946PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JAMISON, J., pro tem.

Plaintiff brought this action to quiet title to certain real property. The defendant Wilford M. Taylor answered the complaint, denying the ownership of plaintiff, and set up a cross-complaint alleging ownership in himself, asking that the title to said property be quieted in him. Judgment went for plaintiff and cross-defendant. From this judgment defendant Taylor appealed. The facts of this case are not disputed and are as follows:

Appellant, desiring to borrow $2,000 from the Hollywood National Bank, requested respondent to indorse his note to said bank for that sum.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bloom v. BloomCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Warden v. NahasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bacon v. BaconCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API