Legal Opinion

Schmalstieg v. Leavenworth Coal Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 6, 1902No. 12,782PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from Leavenworth district court; Louis A. Myers, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*754The opinion of the court was delivered by

Greene, J.:

Joseph Schmalstieg sued the Leavenworth Coal Company for injuries sustained by the explosion of gases in the coal-mine in which he was working as a miner. When plaintiff had introduced his evidence the defendant demurred thereto. The demurrer was sustained and judgment rendered thereon, to reverse which Schmalstieg prosecutes this proceeding.

We are of the opinion that the demurrer should have beenjoverruled. The important and controlling question in the case is, Does a mine-owner, agent, lessee or operator of any coal-mine discharge himself…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Waddell & Walter v. SimosonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  2. Iron Co. v. PaceTennessee Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Sommer v. Carbon Hill Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1898
  4. Colorado Coal & Iron Co. v. LambColorado Court of Appeals · 1895
  5. Redstone Coke Co. v. RobySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Antioch Coal Co. v. RockeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Little v. Norton Coal Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  3. Young v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API