Legal Opinion

Matter of Bishop, Baldwin, Rewald

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1988No. 12229PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

NAKAMURA, J.

The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has certified to this court that there is a question concerning Hawaii law which is determinative of a pending appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii and there is no clear controlling precedent in the decisions of the appellate courts of the State. 1 The question is whether the Bank of Hawaii is liable under Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) §§ 556-4 and 556-8 for checks drawn by Ronald Ray Rewald in violation of his fiduciary duties to Bishop, Baldwin, Rewald, Dillingham &…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Citizens National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  2. Union Bank & Trust Co. v. Girard Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Colby v. Riggs Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937
  4. Bankr. L. Rep. P 70,903 in the Matter of Bishop, Baldwin, Rewald, Dillingham & Wong, Inc., a Hawaii Corporation, Debtor/appellant. Thomas E. Hayes, Trustee v. Ronald Ray Rewald and Nancy Rewald v. Petitioning CreditorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  5. Transport Trucking Co. v. First National BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cieri v. Leticia Query Reality, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Springfield Township v. Mellon PSFS BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Ramos v. Chase Home FinanceDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2011
  4. Nations Title Insurance of New York, Inc. v. BertramOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Marzan v. Bank of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API