Matter of Bishop, Baldwin, Rewald
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
NAKAMURA, J.
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has certified to this court that there is a question concerning Hawaii law which is determinative of a pending appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii and there is no clear controlling precedent in the decisions of the appellate courts of the State. 1 The question is whether the Bank of Hawaii is liable under Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) §§ 556-4 and 556-8 for checks drawn by Ronald Ray Rewald in violation of his fiduciary duties to Bishop, Baldwin, Rewald, Dillingham &…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Johnson v. Citizens National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
- Union Bank & Trust Co. v. Girard Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Colby v. Riggs Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 70,903 in the Matter of Bishop, Baldwin, Rewald, Dillingham & Wong, Inc., a Hawaii Corporation, Debtor/appellant. Thomas E. Hayes, Trustee v. Ronald Ray Rewald and Nancy Rewald v. Petitioning CreditorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Transport Trucking Co. v. First National BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cieri v. Leticia Query Reality, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1995
- Springfield Township v. Mellon PSFS BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Ramos v. Chase Home FinanceDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2011
- Nations Title Insurance of New York, Inc. v. BertramOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- Marzan v. Bank of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.