Legal Opinion

Cha-Kir Realty Corp. v. Sanchez

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided December 6, 1944PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.

In this summary proceeding for nonpayment of rent, the tenants counterclaim against the landlord for remedial damages and a reasonable counsel fee, as provided in the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942 as amended (U. S. Code, tit. 50, Appendix, § 901 et seq.), alleging a violation of the provisions of the Rent Regulation for Housing in the New York City Defense-Rental Area (8 Fed. Reg. 13914).

The essential facts are not disputed. Mr. Mortimer J. Wolford, a duly licensed real estate broker, is the landlord’s managing agent of premises 3140 Broadway, in the borough of Manhat*428tan, New York City,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. People Ex Rel. Price v. Sheffield Farms-Slawson-Decker Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Bowles v. SiskCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Porter v. FiskeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  2. State Commission for Human Rights v. Suburban Associates, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Commission on Human Rights v. Hardenbrook Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Pagan v. MantellCity of New York Municipal Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API