Legal Opinion
City of Tulsa v. Biles
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 27, 1961No. 38982PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Justice.
The City of Tulsa commenced this action to condemn for municipal purposes 80 acres of land southeast of Tulsa, Oklahoma, belonging to A. E. Biles and Fleta Biles, husband and wife. On a trial to the jury, after objections to the report of commissioners and request for jury trial, judgment was entered on a verdict for the defendants for-$75,000, and plaintiff has appealed. Refer-; ence to the parties shall continue as designated in the trial court.
During the trial defendants called three witnesses to determine the value of the 80 acres and improvements thereon. Paul Edwards…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sacramento Etc. R.R. Co. v. HeilbronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Thornton v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- State Highway Commission v. DealOregon Supreme Court · 1951
- Blincoe v. Choctaw, Oklahoma & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
- People v. OlsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Dash v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- Gaylord v. State Ex Rel. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. v. CableSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. BurkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Penn's Grant Associates v. Northampton County Board of Assessment AppealsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.