Legal Opinion

Martindale v. Palmer

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1876PublishedCited by 20 opinions

From the Marion Civil Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBiddle, J.

Appeal from a precept issued by the mayor of the city of Indianapolis to collect the amount of certain assessments against the property of the appellant for street improvements. Proceedings were had, and a final decree rendered ordering the sale of the property to pay the assessments. "We do not notice all the proceedings in detail, but only such as were excepted to by the appellant, and are insisted upon in his brief as erroneous.

1. It is urged that the ordinance under which the improvements were m-ade was not in force at the time the contract *413was let, because it had not been signed by the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Taylor v. PalmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  2. State v. Washington Social Library Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1841
  3. Hellenkamp v. City of LafayetteIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  4. City of Indianapolis v. ImberryIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  5. Ex Parte J. B. Elmendorf v. Mayor of New-YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1841

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Jackson v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Ross v. StackhouseIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Shea v. City of MuncieIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Western Paving & Supply Co. v. Citizens' Street RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Burnett v. MilnesIndiana Supreme Court · 1897

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API