Legal Opinion
Worley v. Dunkle
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 14, 1948PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] At the trial of this action I was constrained to remark that I regarded it to be lamentable that this widow and her step-daughter, the principals in this litigation, should permit personal antagonisms to overcast that intelligent conciliatory prudence which is undoubtedly native to both and thereby possibly to jeopardize the continuance of an industrial enterprise so successfully conducted and developed over a span of years by the late Bayard L. Dunkle.
It was in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States Steel Corp. v. HodgeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1903
- Slutzker v. RieberNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
- Lillard v. Oil, Paint & Drug Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1903
- Raynolds v. Diamond Mills Paper Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1905
- Davis v. Thomas & Davis Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1902
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Farris v. Farris Engineering Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950